The following document contains the listing of user tags found in the code. Below is the summary of the occurrences per tag.
| Tag Class | Total number of occurrences | Tag strings used by tag class |
|---|---|---|
| @deprecated | 21 | @deprecated |
| @todo | 0 | @todo |
| FIXME | 2 | FIXME |
| TODO | 8 | TODO |
| XXX | 2 | XXX |
Each tag is detailed below:
Number of occurrences found in the code: 21
| com.helger.jcodemodel.AbstractJClass | Line |
|---|---|
| calling this method from {@link AbstractJClass} would be meaningless, since it's always guaranteed to return <tt>this</tt>. | 157 |
| Use {@link #wildcardExtends()} instead | 367 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JCodeModel | Line |
| In favor of the new {@link JCMWriter} class offering more configuration flexibility. | 500 |
| In favor of the new {@link JCMWriter} class offering more configuration flexibility. | 517 |
| In favor of the new {@link JCMWriter} class offering more configuration flexibility. | 530 |
| In favor of the new {@link JCMWriter} class offering more configuration flexibility. | 546 |
| In favor of the new {@link JCMWriter} class offering more configuration flexibility. | 569 |
| In favor of the new {@link JCMWriter} class offering more configuration flexibility. | 591 |
| In favor of the new {@link JCMWriter} class offering more configuration flexibility. | 616 |
| In favor of the new {@link JCMWriter} class offering more configuration flexibility. | 634 |
| In favor of the new {@link JCMWriter} class offering more configuration flexibility. | 650 |
| In favor of the new {@link JCMWriter} class offering more configuration flexibility. | 668 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JExpr | Line |
| Use the {@link #dotClass(AbstractJType)} - simply correct camel-casing | 304 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JInvocation | Line |
| Use {@link #args()} instead | 337 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JLambdaMethodRef | Line |
| Use the factory method {@link #createForNew(AbstractJType)} instead. | 93 |
| Use {@link #lhsExpr()} instead | 257 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JMethod | Line |
| Use {@link #varParam()} instead. | 468 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JOp | Line |
| Use {@link #postincr(IJExpression)} instead | 108 |
| Use {@link #postdecr(IJExpression)} instead | 149 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JPackage | Line |
| Use {@link #resourceFiles()} instead | 313 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JPrimitiveType | Line |
| calling this method from {@link JPrimitiveType} would be meaningless, since it's always guaranteed to return <tt>this</tt>. | 124 |
Number of occurrences found in the code: 2
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JAnnotationArrayMember | Line |
|---|---|
| this invocation is invalid if the caller isn't adding annotations into an array so this potentially type-unsafe conversion would be justified. | 422 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JDefinedClass | Line |
| This is incorrect, e.g. for anonymous classes! | 353 |
Number of occurrences found in the code: 8
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JAnonymousClass | Line |
|---|---|
| I think this is incorrect! Some "$1" or the like is missing | 76 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JCommentPart | Line |
| this doesn't print the parameterized type properly | 210 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JDocComment | Line |
| it would be nice if we have JComment class and we can derive this class from there. | 57 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JReferencedClass | Line |
| does JDK 1.5 reflection provides these information? | 200 |
| does JDK 1.5 reflection provides these information? | 208 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.TypedAnnotationWriter | Line |
| enum constant. how should we handle it? | 248 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.fmt.JStaticJavaFile | Line |
| allow those to be specified | 195 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.writer.JCMWriter | Line |
| think about importing | 338 |
Number of occurrences found in the code: 2
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JDefinedClass | Line |
|---|---|
| problems caught in M constructor | 546 |
| com.helger.jcodemodel.JPackage | Line |
| problems caught in the NC constructor | 251 |
